PDF Ebook Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification for Atheism, by Tristan Vick
The soft documents implies that you need to go to the web link for downloading and install and after that conserve Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification For Atheism, By Tristan Vick You have possessed guide to review, you have actually positioned this Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification For Atheism, By Tristan Vick It is uncomplicated as visiting guide establishments, is it? After getting this brief explanation, hopefully you could download and install one and also start to review Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification For Atheism, By Tristan Vick This book is very simple to review whenever you have the spare time.
Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification for Atheism, by Tristan Vick
PDF Ebook Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification for Atheism, by Tristan Vick
Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification For Atheism, By Tristan Vick How can you change your mind to be a lot more open? There numerous sources that could help you to boost your thoughts. It can be from the other encounters and also story from some people. Reserve Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification For Atheism, By Tristan Vick is among the relied on sources to obtain. You could discover numerous publications that we discuss right here in this internet site. As well as now, we reveal you one of the very best, the Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification For Atheism, By Tristan Vick
Reading Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification For Atheism, By Tristan Vick is an extremely valuable interest and also doing that could be gone through any time. It suggests that checking out a book will certainly not restrict your activity, will certainly not require the moment to spend over, and will not invest much money. It is an extremely budget-friendly and reachable point to buy Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification For Atheism, By Tristan Vick But, with that said quite cheap point, you could obtain something brand-new, Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification For Atheism, By Tristan Vick something that you never ever do and enter your life.
A brand-new experience could be gained by reviewing a book Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification For Atheism, By Tristan Vick Also that is this Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification For Atheism, By Tristan Vick or various other book compilations. We provide this publication because you could find more things to encourage your skill and also expertise that will make you a lot better in your life. It will be additionally beneficial for the people around you. We advise this soft file of the book below. To understand ways to get this book Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification For Atheism, By Tristan Vick, find out more below.
You could find the web link that our company offer in site to download and install Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification For Atheism, By Tristan Vick By acquiring the affordable cost and get finished downloading, you have actually completed to the first stage to get this Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification For Atheism, By Tristan Vick It will certainly be absolutely nothing when having bought this book and do nothing. Review it and also reveal it! Spend your few time to merely check out some sheets of web page of this publication Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification For Atheism, By Tristan Vick to check out. It is soft file and also simple to check out anywhere you are. Enjoy your new behavior.
An AMAZON.COM best seller! What if the question "Does God exist?" proved to be meaningless? What if the very definition of "God" was incoherent? Could you still, in good conscience, believe in something if it was incoherent and meaningless? Would it even be possible to talk about an incoherent and meaningless thing meaningfully? If not, then what consequences would follow from this realization? These are the questions which the branch of philosophy known as ignosticism concerns itself with. Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification for Atheism examines these questions and delves into the idea that "God" is a type of language-game. Taking a Wittgensteinian view of language, Tristan Vick takes us on a journey from learning theory to semantics to psychology in this philosophical exploration of whether or not the idea of God holds any relevant meaning. Perhaps more controversial still, Vick makes the case that ignosticism, properly understood, can be used as a positive justification for the reasonableness of atheism.
- Sales Rank: #3551289 in Books
- Published on: 2013-07-29
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 8.00" h x .22" w x 5.25" l, .24 pounds
- Binding: Paperback
- 94 pages
From the Back Cover
What if the question "Does God exist?" proved to be meaningless? What if the very definition of "God" was incoherent? Could you still, in good conscience, believe in something if it was incoherent and meaningless? Would it even be possible to talk about an incoherent and meaningless thing meaningfully? If not, then what consequences would follow from this realization? These are the questions which the branch of philosophy known as ignosticism concerns itself with. Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification for Atheism examines these questions and delves into the idea that "God" is a type of language-game. Taking a Wittgensteinian view of language, Tristan Vick takes us on a journey from learning theory to semantics to psychology in this philosophical exploration of whether or not the idea of God holds any relevant meaning. Perhaps more controversial still, Vick makes the case that ignosticism, properly understood, can be used as a positive justification for the reasonableness of atheism.
About the Author
Tristan Vick graduated from Montana State University with degrees in English Literature and Asian Cultural Studies. He speaks fluent Japanese and lives in Japan with his wife and daughter. When he's not commuting on the train or teaching English, he spends his time reading, writing, blogging, and eating sara-udon.
Most helpful customer reviews
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful.
Looking at the big picture
By Jorge Villaseñor
Using a logical approach, Tristan Vick answers to the ultimate question: "Does God exist?" by taking a step back and asking: "What do you mean by 'God'?", since rarely do people define God in the same manner. The concept of "Ignosticism", though new to me, is probably the best starting point to a better understanding of why religious fundamentalists are wrong. A clear, well-written, down-to-earth explanation of the concept and its multiple repercussions will give the potential reader an new perspective to the question which atheists and believers seem to take for granted.
I absolutely loved this book, and would definitely recommend it to anyone: atheists, agnostics, and believers.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful.
Thought provoking, but unconvincing.
By jaekyeong moon
* I'm from Korean, so sorry for my awful English.
The reason I bought this book is, as an agnostic seeker, to know more about Ignosticism and Theological noncognitivism. I'm really interested in this position, but there are not very much materials about. In fact, there are few contemporary philosophers in religion who talk about theological noncognitivism(as far as I know, only two; Michael Martin and Kai Nielson). So first time I saw this book, I said, "Oh, great! Now I will learn more about Ignosticism and some philosophical argument for that position."
As it turns out, I did. But at the same time, I'm unconvinced, so I can't recommend this book.
Before criticizing this book, I should mention some good things in book. I generally agree with author's observation about theist's way of defining god, especially when he talk about cultural and psychological influence. that part is well-established and backed by references from professionals like Pascal Boyer. I also like his writing style. It makes me easy to understand his argument, or at least make me think that I understand his argument.
That said, I think main argument of the book fails.
Briefly, main argument of this book is like this.
1) If some concept or definition is about real object, It's description has real link to that.
2) If some concept or definition has real link to that, It should pass the Referential Justification.
3) God concept does not pass the Referential Justification.
4) So, God concept is not about real object.
5) As a result, talking about existence of "God" is meaningless(because it can't exist in real world).
Someone who read this review may be curious about premise 1 and say, what does it mean that "having real link to object?" Well, according to the book, it means that the object which is described by the definition is verified, and so its definition is verified by inspecting the object. This means when you want to say that your definition of x has real link to object x, you must show object x is empirically verified and examine your definition with object x.
But the problem of that reasoning is that there are something that supposed to exist, but can't be empirically verified. One example of that thing is "other minds". When I say "mind", I don't mean some dualistic souls which already assumed the supernatural exist, but mean subjective experience dependent on human brain. I know I have a mind. You also does, because you can experience yours. But how about the others? How can we empirically verify other people's subjective experience? You can hear other people's testimony or examine their brain, but eventually don't know whether other people are just like us or philosophical zombie. So this fact makes other minds don't exist? Unless you are a hard skeptic or solipsist, you don't think so, but justification of that is not empirical, but philosophical. The situation is same when we question about existence of world itself(Is this real? or is everything just illusion?), time, abstract object, causality etc. And because of their non-empirical nature, some their definition is also not empirically derived, and some of it like abstract object is entirely non-empirical.
So there are something that supposed to exist, but can't be empirically verified. And even more, there are something that many philosophers think that exist, but has no "real link" to their definition(like God). I think this fact makes whole book in problem, because it seemed to me that the book's hidden premise is this.
0) If something exist, it can be empirically verified.
And If this is false, then premise 1 is also false, so the conclusion of the formula above is also false. So the author has to whether accept that these concepts are also meaningless to discuss like God, or offer some other reason why God concept is meaningless when other non-empirical, philosophical concepts have meaning. Or, he can just admit God concept is, at least, as meaningful as those concepts.
But, I don't know. Maybe I'm wrong, and he is totally right. But there is not much material about this topic and vitually no material about this topic discussed by professional philosopher, I think I can't know who's right even in future.
Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification for Atheism, by Tristan Vick PDF
Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification for Atheism, by Tristan Vick EPub
Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification for Atheism, by Tristan Vick Doc
Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification for Atheism, by Tristan Vick iBooks
Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification for Atheism, by Tristan Vick rtf
Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification for Atheism, by Tristan Vick Mobipocket
Ignosticism: A Philosophical Justification for Atheism, by Tristan Vick Kindle
No comments:
Post a Comment